Aggregate to Amplify! The digital media relay revolution is upon us! Reblog, Repost, Revolt!

Posts Tagged: insurance

"

Consider one of Mr. Romney’s most famous remarks: “Corporations are people, my friend.” When the audience jeered, he elaborated: “Everything corporations earn ultimately goes to people. Where do you think it goes? Whose pockets? Whose pockets? People’s pockets.” This is undoubtedly true, once you take into account the pockets of, say, partners at Bain Capital (who, I hasten to add, are, indeed, people). But one of the main points of outsourcing is to ensure that as little as possible of what corporations earn goes into the pockets of the people who actually work for those corporations.

Why, for example, do many large companies now outsource cleaning and security to outside contractors? Surely the answer is, in large part, that outside contractors can hire cheap labor that isn’t represented by the union and can’t participate in the company health and retirement plans. And, sure enough, recent academic research finds that outsourced janitors and guards receive substantially lower wages and worse benefits than their in-house counterparts.

Just to be clear, outsourcing is only one source of the huge disconnect between a tiny elite and ordinary American workers, a disconnect that has been growing for more than 30 years. And Bain, in turn, was only one player in the growth of outsourcing. So Mitt Romney didn’t personally, single-handedly, destroy the middle-class society we used to have. He was, however, an enthusiastic and very well remunerated participant in the process of destruction; if Bain got involved with your company, one way or another, the odds were pretty good that even if your job survived you ended up with lower pay and diminished benefits.

In short, what was good for Bain Capital definitely wasn’t good for America. And, as I said at the beginning, the Obama campaign has every right to point that out.

"

-

Paul Krugman (NY Times)

Read the whole article here

(via andasfortakingitinstride)

#ThaPink

(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

Source: thatsonedeadflamingo

We’ve still got a long way to go, but this is a good start. Now, about that whole Citizens United thing… 
#ThaPink

We’ve still got a long way to go, but this is a good start. Now, about that whole Citizens United thing…

#ThaPink

"It's constitutional, bitches."

Courtesy of the Executive Director of the Democratic National Convention. Fuck to the YEAH, man.
#ThaPink

Supreme Court upholds Obama’s health-care law - The Washington Post

*PHEW*

That is all.

Oh, and HOORAY! :D

#ThaPink

Michael Tomasky: Democrats Should Come Out Swinging Against the Court - The Daily Beast

Will they? After a seemingly endless series of capitulations on behalf of the left, if there’s ever a time for them to show some actual backbone, it’s now. It’s an election year, and the Dems have to know by now that they don’t have nearly the popular support that they’d like to believe. The Republican narrative is a powerful one, and is gradually absorbing liberalism through the ceaseless pounding of its good name and character. Without a strong counter-narrative to combat this onslaught, a true David v. Goliath struggle to slay the giant, all is stood to loss, and the only thing that might possibly save our country post-Democratic demise will be pure, honest, radical revolution.

#ThaPink

What I’m sayin’.

What I’m sayin’.

"Let’s come back now to the birth control employer question. Thanks to the gains of the feminist movement and Griswold v. Connecticut, we now understand the Constitution to prohibit the government from imposing restrictions on access to birth control. Even most Republicans, I think, accept that. But there’s nothing in the Constitution to stop employers from refusing to provide health insurance coverage for birth control to their employees. And here’s where the McCarthy specter becomes particularly troubling. Notice the second provision of the Arizona legislation: employers will now have the right to question their employees about what they plan to do with their birth-control prescriptions. Not only is this a violation of the right to privacy—again, not a right our Constitution currently recognizes in the workplace—but it obviously can give employers the necessary information they need to fire an employee. If a women admits to using contraception in order to not get pregnant, there’s nothing in the Constitution to stop an anti-birth control employer from firing her."

Source: coreyrobin.com